ECQB 2021 aligns with the “new” syllabus and LOs as published in Amendments 4, 6, 8 and 10 to AMC/GM to Part-FCL (ED Decision 2018/001/R, ED Decision 2018/011/R, ED Decision 2019/017/R and ED Decision 2020/018/R). The Agency maintains two parallel versions of the ECQB, and provides these to the EASA Member State NCAs each year: From February 2022 onwards all examinations should be based on the latest release of the ECQB that aligns to the “new” syllabus. Major changes to these were published in the course of 20, with the deadline for compliance with these changes being the end of January 2022. The ECQB is based on the detailed theoretical knowledge (TK) syllabus and LOs published in AMC/GM to Part-FCL. If you are involved in exam deliveries at an NCA and have identified an error in the current question bank, please report this using the form provided under DOWNLOADS' below. Further rounds of review, as well as the final approval, are performed by EASA. Thanks to close cooperation with Member States, new and existing questions are reviewed to assess their technical accuracy by subject matter experts nominated by the national aviation authorities. Updating the theoretical knowledge syllabus and Learning Objectives (LOs) on which the ECQB is based.Īccording to the ECQB process, new questions are drafted by carefully selected and trained external subject matter experts. Extensive reviews of questions on an annual basis, to ensure they are still current, accurate and relevant,. Replacing old questions with new ones (about 1200 per year), keeping up-to-date with regulatory and technological developments and reflecting current safety concerns,. The Agency continuously improves the quality of the question bank by: Until end January 2022: IFR Communications. Until end January 2022: VFR Communications. The questions included in the ECQB cover all subjects used for the relevant Part-FCL theoretical knowledge examinations. The question bank today is under the responsibility of EASA, and the National Competent Authorities (NCAs) are responsible for the exams using the ECQB. It is an important standardisation and safety tool, ensuring that pilots at European level have the appropriate knowledge and necessary competencies. The ECQB is a bank of some 10,000 questions (Multiple Choice Questions – MCQs) used by all EASA Member States for the theoretical knowledge (TK) examinations of flight crew (professional aeroplane and helicopter pilots and applicants for an instrument rating). European Plan for Aviation Safety (EPAS). European Safety Promotion Network Rotorcraft (ESPN-R). European Operators Flight Data Monitoring (EOFDM). European Authorities Coordination Group on Flight Data Monitoring (EAFDM). Aviation Safety Reporting for Individuals. Aviation Safety Reporting for Organisations. Accident and incident investigation support. Regional Safety Oversight Organisations (RSOOs). Aircraft Noise Certificate or Equivalent Noise Documentation (ANC) Data. Aircraft Noise & Performance (ANP) Data. 
ICAO Aircraft Engine Emissions Databank.Loss of Control (LOC-I) in Approach and Landing.Simpler and lighter rules for GA maintenance.Simpler and lighter rules for GA pilot training.Simpler and lighter rules for Balloons and Sailplanes.The new CS-23 – smart and flexible rules that support innovation.Part-21 Light - Making Design & Manufacturing Easier.Drones - regulatory framework background.Flight Simulation Training Devices (FSTD).European Aero-Medical Repository (EAMR).Manufacturer Scheduled Maintenance Requirements.International Maintenance Review Board Policy Board (IMRBPB).
EASA Part-145 Organisations located in the USA.EASA Part-145 Organisations located in Canada.EASA Part-145 Organisations located in Brazil.Aircraft type ratings for Part-66 aircraft maintenance licence.Alternative Procedures to Design Organisation Approval (ADOA).ATM/ANS & ATCO Training Organisation Approvals.Special Categories of Passengers (SCPs).Non-commercial operations with complex motor-powered aircraft (NCC).Conflict Zone Information Bulletin (CZIB’s).Information Sharing Platform on Conflict Zones.
0 kommentar(er)
